🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have harvested millions of tracks from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them online.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts noted the seeming data breach could boost artificial intelligence firms searching for material to train their technology.

A group known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million rows of metadata such as artist and record names. The company, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not represent its entire inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party scraped public metadata and employed questionable methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Declared Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s information and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would probably be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated material is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a vast online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “create their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. He said it could also enable tech companies to “educate models on modern music at scale”.

Copyright has become a key issue between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government proposal to allow AI companies use protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

A government minister for science, innovation and development told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.